
What have HCPs been telling us?
Since
Ready for REMS began at PAINWeek 2009, we have been getting feedback from healthcare providers (HCPs) and have been able to draw some interesting conclusions about current thoughts on opioid Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). So what are the current overriding feelings among your colleagues regarding opioid REMS?
> Most commonly, people believe REMS will increase safe use of opioids in appropriate patients.
> The next most common opinion is that REMS will make them more confident about prescribing opioids to appropriate patients.
> A significant number of people are worried that it will be more work to prescribe opioids, and that REMS could actually reduce access for appropriate patients.
> Several people indicated that REMS may impact negligibly on improper use of opioids, and that they could lead to a shift in prescribing to less regulated medicines.
This mixed feedback is unsurprising, particularly when you consider that HCPs have been virtually unanimous in telling us that there is not enough information available about REMS.
What HCPs still want to know
The three most important knowledge gaps have remained much the same since September 2009:
> Practical advice about how to prepare for REMS
> How REMS will affect the ability to prescribe opioids
> How REMS will affect patients
This reflects an understandable practical focus: "It’s fine to talk about the goals, but what will opioid REMS mean to me on a daily basis?"
What next?
Since under-treatment of pain is not an option, opioid REMS cannot be ignored. However, questions remain among HCPs about:
> What exactly opioid REMS will entail
> The increase to their workload that opioid REMS will bring
> The impact that opioid REMS will ultimately have on their patients
The worst-case outcome is that a lack of practical information will lead to HCP unpreparedness, which could either result in delayed compliance with opioid REMS (leading to temporary inability to prescribe or dispense), or even the avoidance altogether of prescribing opioids with a REMS. Either result will impact negatively on patients who need these medications. Other stakeholders also have to increase their involvement so that HCPs are better prepared:
> Regulatory authorities need to consolidate what constitutes opioid REMS, both for individual drugs and subclasses.
> Manufacturers need to more efficiently disseminate to all HCPs the new requirements of opioid REMS and how practices should change.
What do you think?
Ready for REMS will continue to play its part in communicating opioid REMS information to HCPs as it becomes available. For us to do this effectively, we need to know what you think! Do you agree with what your peers have told us, or do you have different feelings about opioid REMS? What information do you want to receive about opioid REMS?
Please let us know what you think by
contacting us.
QuantiaMD Survey Results From Your Peers
An abbreviated version of the following slide presentations found in the Resources section on this Web site were posted on www.QuantiaMD.com as a two-part series from February to October 2010:
> The Necessity for REMS
> Practical and Legal Implications of REMS
> Getting Ready for REMS
Viewers were asked to answer questions before and after viewing the presentations. The results of the survey are shown below.
The Necessity for REMS presentation, which also included parts of the Practical and Legal Implications of REMS presentation, was designed to provide background for the need for REMS for opioids and an overview of how REMS might impact current laws.
The presentation, Getting Ready for REMS, was designed to provide practical ways to prepare for the coming opioid REMS.
Back to top